What effect does the Kable v DPP case have on detention based on inadmissible evidence?

The decision in Kable v DPP fundamentally reaffirmed the principle that due process must be adhered to in the legal system, particularly concerning the use of evidence in court proceedings. This landmark case underscored that any evidence relied upon in legal contexts must be admissible in order to protect the rights of individuals and ensure a fair trial.

When the court ruled in Kable v DPP, it established that detaining an individual based on evidence that has not been properly admitted contradicts the principles of justice and fairness, thereby undermining the integrity of the judicial process. Therefore, it mandates that only admissible evidence is permissible in court, ensuring that defendants are judged based on legally acceptable and verified information.

This ruling has significant implications for law enforcement and legal proceedings, as it stands against practices that might otherwise allow an individual to be detained or judged based on unreliable or improperly obtained evidence. As a result, this principle is integral to maintaining the rule of law and protecting individual rights within the judicial system.