What is the outcome when evidence is collected while a suspect is interviewed without a guardian present?

When evidence is collected from a suspect who is interviewed without a guardian present, especially if the suspect is a minor, this evidence is likely deemed inadmissible in court. The reasoning behind this is rooted in the legal principle that vulnerable individuals, such as minors, require additional protections during the interrogation process. The absence of a guardian can lead to concerns about the suspect's ability to understand their rights and the implications of the questioning, potentially resulting in coerced or unreliable statements.

The legal system emphasizes the necessity of ensuring that all parties involved in an interrogation fully comprehend their rights and the nature of the interrogation. Therefore, if proper protocols are not followed, the integrity of the evidence collected can be questioned, leading to its exclusion from court proceedings to uphold fair trial standards and protect the rights of the accused. This aligns with the values of fairness and justice within the legal system.